Term Limit Law Injunction
Thursday, October 23rd, 2008With the vote pending in New York City Council over extending the term limit laws, two of the council members requested a judge stop the vote saying it “poses a conflict of interest”. The extension of the term limit laws has been constantly debated in political circles as well as in the media and with the general public. Twice in the 1990’s, the public voted against the term limit extension, and now the city council wants to take it to vote on their own.
Randy Mastro, who represents council members Bill de Blasio and Letitia James and served as a deputy mayor under Bloomberg’s predecessor Rudy Giuliani, argued it is a conflict for the council to vote to extend their own political careers.
"This case concerns the blatant violation of the City Charter’s conflicts laws that will necessarily result from the Council’s vote on such self-serving legislation," said the lawsuit, filed in New York State Supreme Court.
According to a recent poll, 89 percent of New York City voters say that the vote belongs in their hands, and not in the hands of city council. Should the injunction to stop the vote fail, the 51 members of city council will vote on the law today.
UPDATE: City council voted 29-22 in favor of extending term limits on Thursday evening. Mayor Michael Bloomberg had this to say shortly following their vote:
"Today, the majority of the City Council decided to give the people of New York a fuller choice in the November, 2009 election. I believe that was the right choice, and I want to thank Speaker Quinn for her leadership.
"Those of us who work on both sides of City Hall must now move forward with the important decisions that face us, particularly finding ways to soften the fallout from the economic downturn and balancing our budget as revenues decline. We have a lot of work to do together to get New York through these tough times."










